Partial pericardiectomy for refractory acute tuberculous pericarditis: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Tuberculosis is an infectious disease that usually manifests in the lungs but can also affect other organs, including the cardiovascular system. In this article, we present a rare case of purulent pericarditis caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 67-year-old man was admitted to the emergency department with a large pericardial effusion with evidence of cardiac tamponade caused by acute pericarditis. The patient underwent surgical pericardial drainage, and a total volume of 500 mL of purulent fluid was collected with a positive culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Despite antituberculous drugs, the patient presented with clinical worsening and recurrence of large pericardial effusion. Therefore, he was submitted to a second intervention by full median sternotomy to drain the pericardial effusion and perform a surgical pericardial debridement associated with a partial pericardiectomy. After the procedure, he improved clinically and was discharged after 24 days of hospitalization. DISCUSSION: Pericardiectomy is recommended for patients with refractory tuberculous pericarditis after four to eight weeks of antituberculous treatment. We decided not to wait that long to perform an open surgical partial pericardiectomy and debridement with a median sternotomy approach. We believe that this more aggressive surgical approach would be more efficient to combat the infection, which was causing progressive deterioration of patient's clinical condition and early recurrence of significant pericardial effusion. CONCLUSION: Open partial pericardiectomy with surgical debridement could be an efficient approach for treatment of a refractory acute tuberculous pericarditis.

Redo aortic valve surgery in a case of dextrocardia with situs inversus totalis.

INTRODUCTION: Dextrocardia is a rare congenital cardiac anomaly where the base-apex axis of the heart is directed to the right side. It may be associated with situs solitus, situs inversus, or situs ambiguous. Such cases are technically challenging when heart surgery is needed. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We presented a case of a patient with dextrocardia and situs inversus totalis, who had severe aortic bioprosthetic valve degeneration needing a redo aortic valve replacement. Our operative strategy was to change the position of the main surgeon to the left side of the patient to perform most surgical steps. DISCUSSION: A meticulous pre-operative surgical plan involving the whole team was very important for a smooth intra-operative course and a favourable outcome. Regarding the position of the main surgeon standing on the left side of the patient, we believed this surgical team arrangement added much to the technical ease for the procedure, since the anatomy was opposite to what our minds are used to. Also, computed tomography scan played a crucial role for a proper preoperative anatomical evaluation and surgical planning. CONCLUSION: Our approach with the surgeon on the left side provided excellent exposure for redo aortic valve replacement in dextrocardia with situs inversus totalis. This surgical management played an important role for the good result in this technically challenging scenario.

Impact of Aortic Valve Function and the Need for Aortic Valve Repair on Long-Term Outcomes of Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement: 13-Year Experience of David Operation.

BACKGROUND: The best approach for aortic root disease remains controversial. Composite valve-graft conduit (CVG) replacement offers good results at short-term and long-term follow-up; on the other hand, valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) has proven to be an excellent treatment alternative. This study aimed to analyse the outcomes after VSARR and compare whether preoperative moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and or the need for aortic valve repair (AVR) during this procedure influenced survival and freedom from reoperation rates. METHODS: From September 2005 to June 2018, 104 patients underwent VSARR using the reimplantation technique: 64% presented with preoperative moderate or severe AR, concomitant AVR was performed in 43.3%, Marfan syndrome was present in 16.3%, and 12.5% had a bicuspid aortic valve. Complete follow-up was obtained in 91% of the sample, echocardiographic results were available for 86% and the mean follow-up time was 1,893 days. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 2.9% and one death occurred 42 days after hospital discharge. In the latest echocardiographic assessment, 88.3% presented with mild AR or better. Freedom from reoperation at 8 years was 95.4%. There was no case of endocarditis and one patient had a stroke 2 years after the operation. There were no between-group differences in morbidity, mortality and complications during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: VSARR can be performed with low mortality rates and reasonable durability of the aortic valve. Neither moderate or severe AR nor the need for aortic valve repair during the procedure altered survival and freedom from reoperation.

Brazilian single-center experience with aortic root replacement in 448 patients: what is the best technique?

Abstract Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a surgery with the use of valved conduit is capable of leading to better immediate and late results than those obtained by the valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction technique. Methods: Between January 2002 and June 2016, 448 patients underwent aortic root reconstruction. These were divided into three groups according to the technique used: 319 (71.2%) patients received mechanical valved conduits, 49 (10.9%) received biological valved conduits, and 80 (17.9%) underwent the valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction technique. The results were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses of Cox proportional hazards models with multiple logistic regression. Results: The hospital mortality rate was 7.5%. The mortality rates were 8.2%, 12%, and 2.5% in the mechanical valved conduit, biological valved conduit, and aortic valve-sparing groups, respectively, with no significant difference between groups (P=0.1). Thromboembolic complications and reoperation-free survival were also similar (P=0.169 and P=0.688). However, valve-sparing aortic root replacement was superior in terms of long-term survival (P<0.001), hemorrhagic-free survival (P<0.001), and endocarditis-free survival (P=0.048). Multivariate analysis showed that the following aspects had an impact on mortality: age > 70 years (P<0.001; hazard ratio [HR] 1.05), preoperative acute kidney injury (P<0.0042; HR 2.9), diagnosis of dissection (P<0.01; HR 2.0), previous cardiac surgery (P<0.027; HR 2.3), associated coronary artery bypass grafting (P<0.038; HR 1.8), reoperation for postoperative tamponade (P<0.004; HR 2.2) and postoperative acute kidney injury (P<0.02; HR 3.35). Conclusion: Valve-sparing technique seems to be the operation of choice, whenever possible, for aortic root reconstruction.

Brazilian Single-Center Experience with Aortic Root Replacement in 448 Patients: What Is the Best Technique?

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a surgery with the use of valved conduit is capable of leading to better immediate and late results than those obtained by the valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction technique. METHODS: Between January 2002 and June 2016, 448 patients underwent aortic root reconstruction. These were divided into three groups according to the technique used: 319 (71.2%) patients received mechanical valved conduits, 49 (10.9%) received biological valved conduits, and 80 (17.9%) underwent the valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction technique. The results were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses of Cox proportional hazards models with multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The hospital mortality rate was 7.5%. The mortality rates were 8.2%, 12%, and 2.5% in the mechanical valved conduit, biological valved conduit, and aortic valve-sparing groups, respectively, with no significant difference between groups (P=0.1). Thromboembolic complications and reoperationfree survival were also similar (P=0.169 and P=0.688). However, valve-sparing aortic root replacement was superior in terms of long-term survival (P<0.001), hemorrhagic-free survival (P<0.001), and endocarditis-free survival (P=0.048). Multivariate analysis showed that the following aspects had an impact on mortality: age > 70 years (P<0.001; hazard ratio [HR] 1.05), preoperative acute kidney injury (P<0.0042; HR 2.9), diagnosis of dissection (P<0.01; HR 2.0), previous cardiac surgery (P<0.027; HR 2.3), associated coronary artery bypass grafting (P<0.038; HR 1.8), reoperation for postoperative tamponade (P<0.004; HR 2.2) and postoperative acute kidney injury (P<0.02; HR 3.35). CONCLUSION: Valve-sparing technique seems to be the operation of choice, whenever possible, for aortic root reconstruction.

The learning curve effect on outcomes with frozen elephant trunk technique for extensive thoracic aorta disease.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the learning curve effect on hospital mortality, postoperative outcomes, freedom from reintervention in the aorta and long-term survival after frozen elephant trunk (FET) operation. METHODS: From July 2009 to June 2018, 79 patients underwent surgery with the FET technique. They had type A aortic dissection (acute 7.6%, chronic 33%), type B aortic dissection (acute 1.26%, chronic 34.2%), and complex thoracic aortic aneurysm (24%). 27.8% were reoperations and 43% received concomitant cardiac procedures. To compare the results, the sample was divided into group 1 (G1) (first half of the sample - operations from 2009 to 2014) and group 2 (G2) (first half of the sample - operations from 2015 to 2018). RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality was 20.25%, 30.7% for G1 and 10% for G2 (P = .02). The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time, myocardial ischemia time, and selective cerebral perfusion at 25°C time were 154 ± 31, 118 ± 32, and 59 ± 12 minutes, respectively, similar for both groups. Stroke and spinal cord injury occurred in four and two patients, with no difference between groups (P = .61 and P = .24). The necessity for secondary intervention on the downstream aorta for both groups was also similar (P = .136). Five of sixty-three surviving patients died during the follow-up period and the estimated survival rate was different between groups 49% vs 88% (P = .007). CONCLUSION: The learning curve with the FET procedure had a significant impact on hospital mortality and midterm survival over the follow-up period, albeit did not influence the freedom from reintervention on the downstream aorta.

Use of 3D Printing in Preoperative Planning and Training for Aortic Endovascular Repair and Aortic Valve Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become an affordable tool for assisting heart surgeons in the aorta endovascular field, both in surgical planning, education and training of residents and students. This technique permits the construction of physical prototypes from conventional medical images by converting the anatomical information into computer aided design (CAD) files. OBJECTIVE: To present the 3D printing feature on developing prototypes leading to improved aortic endovascular surgical planning, as well as transcatheter aortic valve implantation, and mainly enabling training of the surgical procedure to be performed on patient's specific condition. METHODS: Six 3D printed real scale prototypes were built representing different aortic diseases, taken from real patients, to simulate the correction of the disease with endoprosthesis deployment. RESULTS: In the hybrid room, the 3D prototypes were examined under fluoroscopy, making it possible to obtain images that clearly delimited the walls of the aorta and its details. The endovascular simulation was then able to be performed, by correctly positioning the endoprosthesis, followed by its deployment. CONCLUSION: The 3D printing allowed the construction of aortic diseases realistic prototypes, offering a 3D view from the two-dimensional image of computed tomography (CT) angiography, allowing better surgical planning and surgeon training in the specific case beforehand.

Use of 3d printing in preoperative planning and training for aortic endovascular repair and aortic valve disease

Abstract Introduction: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become an affordable tool for assisting heart surgeons in the aorta endovascular field, both in surgical planning, education and training of residents and students. This technique permits the construction of physical prototypes from conventional medical images by converting the anatomical information into computer aided design (CAD) files. Objective: To present the 3D printing feature on developing prototypes leading to improved aortic endovascular surgical planning, as well as transcatheter aortic valve implantation, and mainly enabling training of the surgical procedure to be performed on patient's specific condition. Methods: Six 3D printed real scale prototypes were built representing different aortic diseases, taken from real patients, to simulate the correction of the disease with endoprosthesis deployment. Results: In the hybrid room, the 3D prototypes were examined under fluoroscopy, making it possible to obtain images that clearly delimited the walls of the aorta and its details. The endovascular simulation was then able to be performed, by correctly positioning the endoprosthesis, followed by its deployment. Conclusion: The 3D printing allowed the construction of aortic diseases realistic prototypes, offering a 3D view from the two-dimensional image of computed tomography (CT) angiography, allowing better surgical planning and surgeon training in the specific case beforehand.

Dissecção da aorta: manejo clínico e cirúrgico / Aortic dissection: clinical anda surgical management

A dissecção da aorta é uma condição grave cujo diagnóstico preciso precoce é fun-damental para a sobrevida dos pacientes. Dentro do contexto da dor torácica aguda no setor de emergência, seu diagnóstico pode passar despercebido, o que exige um alto índice de suspeição para ser realizado em tempo hábil. A disponibilidade dos métodos de imagem têm contribuído para a prontidão desse diagnóstico. Os objetivos iniciais do tratamento consistem no controle da dor e da pressão arterial através, principalmente, do uso de betabloqueadores endovenosos. Tais medidas diminuem o stress na parede da aorta, minimizando a propagação da delaminação. A identificação da localização do segmento de aorta dissecado é crucial, pois impacta no tratamento e no prognóstico. Pacientes com dissecção tipo B de Stanford e sem complicações podem receber trata-mento medicamentoso exclusivo, enquanto que a dissecção aguda tipo A de Stanford é uma emergência cirúrgica. Em relação à cirurgia, têm-se discutido o benefício da técnica do Frozen Elephant Trunk, a qual corrige uma maior extensão de aorta comprometida, po-dendo beneficiar pacientes com isquemia distal, apesar de apresentar maior complexidade e aumentar o risco de complicações neurológicas. Para as dissecções tipo B, o reparo endovascular tem sido amplamente utilizado e vários especialistas têm sugerido essa abordagem também para os casos não complicados, pois estudos recentes descrevem a influência do tratamento no remodelamento aórtico e, consequentemente, na sobrevida

Aortic dissection is a dramatic condition whose early accurate diagnosis is fundamen-tal for patient survival. Within the context of acute chest pain in the emergency room, its diagnosis can be overlooked, requiring a high level of suspicion to be performed in a timely manner. The availability of imaging methods has contributed to a faster diagnosis. The initial management goal is to control pain and blood pressure, mainly through the use of intra-venous beta-blockers. This strategy decreases shear stress on the aortic wall, minimizing the progression of delamination. Identifying the location of the dissected aortic segment is crucial, as this will impact on the treatment and prognosis. Patients with uncomplicated Stanford type B dissection may receive pharmaceutical treatment alone, while acute type A dissection is a surgical emergency. In relation to surgery, the benefit of the "Frozen Ele-phant Trunk" technique has been discussed, which corrects a greater area of compromised aorta and may benefit patients with distal ischemia, despite adding greater complexity and increasing the risk of neurological complications. For type B dissections, endovascular repair has been widely used, and several experts have also suggested this approach for uncomplicated cases, as recent studies have described the influence of the treatment on aortic remodeling and consequently, on survival

Hybrid Approach of Aortic Diseases: Zone 1 Delivery and Volumetric Analysis on the Descending Aorta.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional techniques of surgical correction of arch and descending aortic diseases remains as high-risk procedures. Endovascular treatments of abdominal and descending thoracic aorta have lower surgical risk. Evolution of both techniques - open debranching of the arch and endovascular approach of the descending aorta - may extend a less invasive endovascular treatment for a more extensive disease with necessity of proximal landing zone in the arch. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate descending thoracic aortic remodeling by means of volumetric analysis after hybrid approach of aortic arch debranching and stenting the descending aorta. METHODS: Retrospective review of seven consecutive patients treated between September 2014 and August 2016 for diseases of proximal descending aorta (aneurysms and dissections) by hybrid approach to deliver the endograft at zone 1. Computed tomography angiography were analyzed using a specific software to calculate descending thoracic aorta volumes pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: Follow-up was done in 100% of patients with a median time of 321 days (range, 41-625 days). No deaths or permanent neurological complications were observed. There were no endoleaks or stent migrations. Freedom from reintervention was 100% at 300 days and 66% at 600 days. Median volume reduction was of 45.5 cm3, representing a median volume shrinkage by 9.3%. CONCLUSION: Hybrid approach of arch and descending thoracic aorta diseases is feasible and leads to a favorable aortic remodeling with significant volume reduction.

Resection of Left Atrial Myxoma in a Patient with Retrosternal Gastric Tube: a Case Report.

The median sternotomy remains the standard approach in cardiovascular surgery but, in some conditions, it can be considered difficult to perform, especially in patients with history of esophagectomy. This case report describes a successful resection of a left atrial myxoma through a right anterolateral thoracotomy approach in a patient with a previous retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction. The decision for the best surgical approach was made after a heart surgery team discussion. Through this surgical access, a safe and excellent exposure of the left atrium was possible, and a complete resection of the myxoma was performed without any injury to the gastric tube.

Hybrid approach of aortic diseases: zone 1 delivery and volumetric analysis on the descending aorta

Abstract Introduction: Conventional techniques of surgical correction of arch and descending aortic diseases remains as high-risk procedures. Endovascular treatments of abdominal and descending thoracic aorta have lower surgical risk. Evolution of both techniques - open debranching of the arch and endovascular approach of the descending aorta - may extend a less invasive endovascular treatment for a more extensive disease with necessity of proximal landing zone in the arch. Objective: To evaluate descending thoracic aortic remodeling by means of volumetric analysis after hybrid approach of aortic arch debranching and stenting the descending aorta. Methods: Retrospective review of seven consecutive patients treated between September 2014 and August 2016 for diseases of proximal descending aorta (aneurysms and dissections) by hybrid approach to deliver the endograft at zone 1. Computed tomography angiography were analyzed using a specific software to calculate descending thoracic aorta volumes pre- and postoperatively. Results: Follow-up was done in 100% of patients with a median time of 321 days (range, 41-625 days). No deaths or permanent neurological complications were observed. There were no endoleaks or stent migrations. Freedom from reintervention was 100% at 300 days and 66% at 600 days. Median volume reduction was of 45.5 cm3, representing a median volume shrinkage by 9.3%. Conclusion: Hybrid approach of arch and descending thoracic aorta diseases is feasible and leads to a favorable aortic remodeling with significant volume reduction.

Resection of left atrial myxoma in a patient with retrosternal gastric tube: a case report

Abstract The median sternotomy remains the standard approach in cardiovascular surgery but, in some conditions, it can be considered difficult to perform, especially in patients with history of esophagectomy. This case report describes a successful resection of a left atrial myxoma through a right anterolateral thoracotomy approach in a patient with a previous retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction. The decision for the best surgical approach was made after a heart surgery team discussion. Through this surgical access, a safe and excellent exposure of the left atrium was possible, and a complete resection of the myxoma was performed without any injury to the gastric tube.

Does aortic valve repair in valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction compromise the longevity of the procedure?

OBJECTIVES:: The effect of performing aortic valve repair in combination with valve-sparing operation on the length of time for which patients are free from reoperation is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine if the performance of aortic valve repair during valve-sparing operation modified the freedom from reoperation time. METHODS:: From January 2003 to July 2014, 78 patients with a mean age of 49±15 years underwent valve-sparing operation. Sixty-eight percent of these patients were male. Twenty-two (28%) aortic valve repair procedures were performed in this patient population. In the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group, 77.3% of patients had moderate/severe aortic insufficiency, while in the valve-sparing operation group, 58.6% of patients had moderate/severe aortic insufficiency (ns = not significant). Additionally, 13.6% of patients in the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group had functional class III/IV, while 14.2% of patients in the valve-sparing operation group had functional class III/IV (ns). RESULTS:: The in-hospital and late mortality rates, for the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation and valve-sparing operation groups were similar, as they were 4.5% and 3.6%; and 0% and 1.8%, respectively. In the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group, 0% of patients presented moderate/severe aortic insufficiency during late follow-up, while in the valve-sparing operation group, 14.2% of patients presented with moderate/severe aortic insufficiency during this period (ns). In the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group, 5.3% of patients presented with functional class III/IV, while in the valve-sparing operation group, 4.2% of patients presented with functional class III/IV (ns). In the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group, 0% of patients required reoperation, while in the valve-sparing operation group, 3.6% of patients required reoperation over a mean follow-up period of 1621±1156 days (75 patients). CONCLUSION:: Valve-sparing operation is a safe and long-lasting procedure and performance of aortic valve repair when necessary does not increase risk of reoperation on the aortic valve.

Does aortic valve repair in valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction compromise the longevity of the procedure?

OBJECTIVES: The effect of performing aortic valve repair in combination with valve-sparing operation on the length of time for which patients are free from reoperation is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine if the performance of aortic valve repair during valve-sparing operation modified the freedom from reoperation time. METHODS: From January 2003 to July 2014, 78 patients with a mean age of 49±15 years underwent valve-sparing operation. Sixty-eight percent of these patients were male. Twenty-two (28%) aortic valve repair procedures were performed in this patient population. In the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group, 77.3% of patients had moderate/severe aortic insufficiency, while in the valve-sparing operation group, 58.6% of patients had moderate/severe aortic insufficiency (ns = not significant). Additionally, 13.6% of patients in the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group had functional class III/IV, while 14.2% of patients in the valve-sparing operation group had functional class III/IV (ns). RESULTS: The in-hospital and late mortality rates, for the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation and valve-sparing operation groups were similar, as they were 4.5% and 3.6%; and 0% and 1.8%, respectively. In the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group, 0% of patients presented moderate/severe aortic insufficiency during late follow-up, while in the valve-sparing operation group, 14.2% of patients presented with moderate/severe aortic insufficiency during this period (ns). In the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group, 5.3% of patients presented with functional class III/IV, while in the valve-sparing operation group, 4.2% of patients presented with functional class III/IV (ns). In the aortic valve repair + valve-sparing operation group, 0% of patients required reoperation, while in the valve-sparing operation group, 3.6% of patients required reoperation over a mean follow-up period of 1621±1156 days (75 patients). CONCLUSION: Valve-sparing operation is a safe and long-lasting procedure and performance of aortic valve repair when necessary does not increase risk of reoperation on the aortic valve.

Novas perspectivas no tratamento cirúrgico da estenose aórtica / New perspectives in the surgical treatment of aortic stenosis

A estenose aórtica degenerativa é a doença valvar adquirida mais comum em adultos, acometendo principalmente os idosos. A cirurgia de substituição da valva aórtica é o tratamento de escolha nos pacientes com estenose aórtica importante sintomática. Seus resultados são reproduzíveis e bem estabelecidos. Porém, cerca de um terço dos pacientes são considerados inoperáveis devido ao risco cirúrgico inaceitável. Em consequência, nos últimos anos, novas alternativas de tratamento intervencionista foram introduzidas na prática clínica, com resultados iniciais favoráveis. Atualmente, as opções englobam a cirurgia de troca da valva aórtica, o implante da valva aórtica transcateter e, mais recentemente, a cirurgia de troca valvar aórtica sem sutura. Técnicas cirúrgicas minimamente invasivas não demonstraram diferença na mortalidade, porém chamam a atenção pelo resultado similar à esternotomia clássica, melhor resultado estético e menor tempo de hospitalização. Além disso, para evitar a utilização de próteses, técnicas de reconstrução valvar têm sido descritas. No implante de valva transcateter, o treinamento de equipe multidisciplinar é mandatório para a criteriosa seleção dos pacientes e da via de acesso. Os acessos transapical e transaórtico evoluíram como opções eficazes e vantajosas nos pacientes não candidatos para a via femoral. A familiaridade dos cirurgiões com essas abordagens tem contribuído para os bons resultados descritos. Um centro que seja capaz de oferecer todas essas alternativas de tratamento poderá selecionar a técnica mais apropriada, considerando a preferência do paciente e avaliando características fundamentais como idade, comorbidades, fragilidade e anatomia. Experiente "Heart Team" será capaz de fazer a escolha mais adequada.

Degenerative aortic stenosis is the most common acquired valvular disease in adults, affecting mainly the elderly. Surgical aortic valve replacement is the treatment of choice in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Its results are reproducible and well established. However, about one third of patients are considered inoperable because of unacceptable surgical risk. Therefore, in the past few years, new alternative interventional treatments were introduced in clinical practice, with favorable initial results. Currently, the options include surgical aortic valve replacement, transcatheter aortic valve implantation and more recently, sutureless aortic valve replacement. Minimally invasive surgical techniques showed no difference in mortality, but caIl attention for similar result to the classic sternotomy, better cosmetic effect and shorter length of hospital stay. Furthermore, to avoid the use of prostheses, valve reconstruction techniques have been described. In transcatheter valve implantation, training multidisciplinary team is mandatory for careful selection of patients and access routes. The transapical and transaortic approaches evolved as effective and advantageous options in patients not candidates for transfemoral access. The familiarity of surgeons with these routes has contributed to the good results described. A center that is able to offer ali of these therapeutic alternatives can select the most appropriate technique, considering the patient' s preferences and evaluating crucial characteristics such as age, comorbidities, frailty and anatomy. An experienced "Heart Team" will be able to make the most adequate choice.